Practice Areas
Estate Planning
Practice Areas
Many families in Woodland Hills and across the San Fernando Valley built their wealth the same way: Mom and Dad bought a house decades ago, paid it off, and planned to pass it to the kids. Under Proposition 13, property taxes stayed low as long as the home stayed in the family. A 1986 law called Proposition 58 made that promise explicit — children could inherit a parent’s home or rental property and keep the low tax base, sometimes saving tens of thousands of dollars per year.
Then, in November 2020, California voters passed Proposition 19. It took effect for parent-to-child and grandparent-to-grandchild transfers on February 16, 2021, and it fundamentally changed what families can expect when they inherit California real estate.
If your parents own a home in Woodland Hills — or anywhere in California — this affects your estate plan. Here is what changed, what the real numbers look like, and what you can do about it.
Before Proposition 19, Proposition 58 (passed in 1986) gave families a powerful property tax benefit when inheriting real estate. Under Prop 58:
Proposition 193 (1996) extended those same rules to grandparent-to-grandchild transfers, provided the parents of the grandchildren were deceased.
The practical effect in a market like Woodland Hills was enormous. A home bought in 1985 for $180,000 carries an assessed value today (after decades of Prop 13’s 2% annual cap) of roughly $310,000 — even if that home is now worth $1.6 million. Under Prop 58, a child could inherit it, keep renting it out, and pay property taxes on $310,000: approximately $3,900 per year. At full reassessment, those taxes jump to roughly $20,000 per year. Prop 58 didn’t require the child to live there. That benefit is exactly what Proposition 19 eliminated.
Proposition 19 passed with 51% of the vote and took effect for parent-child transfers on February 16, 2021. It is not retroactive: any transfer completed before that date under Prop 58 remains fully protected. The California Board of Equalization administers the new rules.
Under Prop 19, a child can avoid reassessment when inheriting a parent’s home only if all three conditions are met:
Even when all three conditions are met, the exclusion is not unlimited. The law imposes a dollar cap on how much appreciation can be sheltered.
If a child moves in on time, the Prop 19 exclusion only protects appreciation up to $1,000,000 above the parent’s existing assessed value. Any fair market value beyond that cap is added to the taxable base. The cap adjusts for inflation — it currently stands at $1,044,586 through February 15, 2027, per the Board of Equalization.
Using the BOE’s own example: a parent’s home has a factored base year value of $300,000 and a fair market value of $1,500,000 at death. The cap threshold is $300,000 + $1,000,000 = $1,300,000. The excess above the cap is $1,500,000 − $1,300,000 = $200,000. That $200,000 is added to the assessed value. The child’s new tax base is $500,000.
If a child inherits a parent’s home but does not move in and file the homeowners’ exemption within one year, the property is reassessed at full fair market value as of the transfer date. There is no partial protection, no grace period, no alternative filing.
The same full-reassessment rule applies to rental properties, vacation homes, second properties, commercial real estate, and investment properties of any kind. Under Prop 58, the $1 million “other property” exclusion protected many of these assets. Under Prop 19, that exclusion no longer exists.
Consider a common situation: Maria lives in Encino. Her parents bought their Woodland Hills home in 1988 for $215,000. After decades of Prop 13 adjustments, the assessed value sits at $320,000 — but the home is now worth $1.45 million. Her parents paid approximately $3,800 per year in property taxes.
They pass and leave the home equally to Maria and her two brothers, David (in Sacramento) and Carlos (in San Diego). None of them lives in Woodland Hills. Under Prop 58, they could have kept the home, rented it for $5,000–$5,500 per month, and paid taxes on the $320,000 assessed value. Under Prop 19, that option is gone. Because none of them establishes the home as their primary residence within one year, it is reassessed at $1.45 million. Property taxes jump to approximately $17,400 per year — an increase of more than $13,000 annually, indefinitely.
Maria considers moving in. But the estate is in probate — her parents had only a will, no trust. Los Angeles County probate typically takes 12 to 18 months from filing to distribution. By the time she legally receives the property, the one-year window may already be closed.
When two or three adult children inherit a home equally under Prop 19, even when one sibling wants to move in, the logistics are more complicated than they appear.
California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 63.2 provides that at least one eligible transferee must occupy the inherited property as their primary residence for the exclusion to apply. If one of three co-inheriting siblings moves in within the one-year window and files for the homeowners’ exemption, the exclusion can apply — but the $1 million cap still applies to the full assessed value.
The exclusion claim (Form BOE-19-P) must be filed with the LA County Assessor within three years of the transfer date, or before any sale to a third party — whichever comes first. Shares purchased from siblings are newly acquired interests and may be separately reassessed at the purchase price. Getting this right requires coordination between the trust administration process, the county assessor’s timeline, and any buyout negotiations.
A living trust distributes property immediately upon death, bypassing probate entirely. The one-year move-in clock starts running at a moment when an heir can actually act on it. A will alone guarantees the clock runs while the family waits for a Los Angeles probate court — often 12 to 18 months. This single distinction can determine whether a $12,000-per-year tax increase is avoided or not.
If one child intends to live in the family home, the trust should reflect that — not just divide the property equally. Naming the intended occupant and addressing any buyout of siblings’ shares within the trust structure avoids the family negotiation that often consumes the one-year window.
Inherited property receives a stepped-up cost basis equal to fair market value at the date of death. If a home is worth $1.4 million at death and a child sells it shortly after inheriting, California and federal capital gains taxes may be minimal or zero. For families where no one wants to live in the home, a prompt sale is often more financially sound than holding a fully reassessed property.
Once a parent has passed, options narrow sharply. Strategies available now — certain trust structures, gifting approaches, property conversions — are unavailable after death. If your parents own property that has appreciated significantly, reviewing their estate plan now is worth doing.
If a parent has already passed, here are the deadlines that matter:
If the estate is currently in probate, speak with your attorney now about how the Prop 19 timeline intersects with the court schedule. Waiting until probate closes to think about this may cost the family the exclusion entirely.
Proposition 19 changed the rules that many Woodland Hills families counted on. The difference between a well-structured estate plan and no plan at all can be $12,000 or more in property taxes every year — indefinitely. Schedule a consultation with Alice Salvo to discuss your family’s specific situation: 818-676-9572.
This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Property tax law and individual circumstances vary. Consult a licensed California estate planning attorney for advice specific to your situation.